<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 5:40 AM, Sebastian Huber <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de" target="_blank">sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><span class="gmail-"><br>
<br>
On 31/01/18 12:09, Sebastian Huber wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
On 27/01/18 23:49, Joel Sherrill wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
Hi<br>
<br>
This bsp builder test report shows about 25 build failures.<br>
<br>
<a href="https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/build/2018-January/000333.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.rtems.org/piperm<wbr>ail/build/2018-January/000333.<wbr>html</a><br>
</blockquote>
<br>
The problems seem to be an issue with the BSP builder:<br>
<br>
../configure --target=powerpc-rtems5 --enable-rtemsbsp=qoriq_e6500_<wbr>64 ss555<br>
configure: WARNING: you should use --build, --host, --target<br>
configure: loading site script /usr/share/site/x86_64-unknown<wbr>-linux-gnu<br>
checking for gmake... gmake<br>
checking for RTEMS Version... 5.0.0<br>
checking build system type... Invalid configuration `ss555': machine `ss555' not recognized<br>
configure: error: /bin/sh /home/EB/sebastian_h/git-rtems<wbr>/./config.sub ss555 failed<br></blockquote></span></blockquote><div><br></div><div>

<span style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:small;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial;float:none;display:inline"><span>Weird. </span>I did another build overnight and I don't see it in the list archives by date. But when I </span><br></div><div><span style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:small;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial;float:none;display:inline">go by author, I see it. There are failures in it that I can't reproduce by hand. </span></div><div><span style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:small;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial;float:none;display:inline"><br></span></div><div><span style="text-align:start;text-indent:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial;float:none;display:inline"><a href="https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/build/2018-January/000376.html">https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/build/2018-January/000376.html</a><br></span></div><div><span style="text-align:start;text-indent:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial;float:none;display:inline"><br></span></div><div><span style="text-align:start;text-indent:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial;float:none;display:inline">Specifically I tried the first one on the list and it build for me this morning. This</span></div><div><span style="text-align:start;text-indent:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial;float:none;display:inline">is listed as a failure.</span></div><div><br></div><div><span style="text-align:start;text-indent:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial;float:none;display:inline"><div>/home/joel/rtems-work/rtems/configure --target=arm-rtems5\</div><div>>       --enable-rtemsbsp=arm1136jfs --prefix=/home/joel/rtems-work/bsps\</div><div>>       --enable-debug </div><div><br></div><div>Can anyone explain the difference?</div></span></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><span class="gmail-"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
</blockquote>
<br></span>
The above is one issue. The below is another issue.<div class="gmail-HOEnZb"><div class="gmail-h5"><br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<br>
On powerpc only the qoriq and t32mppc BSPs support SMP. How does the BSP builder know that SMP is supported for a particular BSP?<br></blockquote></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>This is a Chris question.</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div class="gmail-HOEnZb"><div class="gmail-h5"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
-- <br>
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH<br>
<br>
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany<br>
Phone   : <a href="tel:%2B49%2089%20189%2047%2041-16" value="+4989189474116" target="_blank">+49 89 189 47 41-16</a><br>
Fax     : <a href="tel:%2B49%2089%20189%2047%2041-09" value="+4989189474109" target="_blank">+49 89 189 47 41-09</a><br>
E-Mail  : <a href="mailto:sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de" target="_blank">sebastian.huber@embedded-brain<wbr>s.de</a><br>
PGP     : Public key available on request.<br>
<br>
Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.<br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div>