<div dir="auto"><div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, Jul 6, 2020, 6:14 PM Gedare Bloom <<a href="mailto:gedare@rtems.org">gedare@rtems.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 10:12 AM Mritunjay Sharma<br>
<<a href="mailto:mritunjaysharma394@gmail.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">mritunjaysharma394@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> Hello everyone,<br>
><br>
> Thank you, Heinz, Gedare, Chris and Joel for your advice.<br>
> If there are issues in making a buildset for 4.10<br>
> then should I build EPICS with RTEMS 5 by hand first and note<br>
> down the process and then proceed to make the buildset for it?<br>
><br>
<br>
Yes.<br></blockquote></div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">+1</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">And by 5, we definitely mean the 5 branch for all rtems repo and the similarly named one for libbsd.</div><div dir="auto"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
> Please suggest for the future steps.<br>
><br>
> Thanks<br>
> Mritunjay<br>
><br>
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 5:38 AM Joel Sherrill <<a href="mailto:joel@rtems.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">joel@rtems.org</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> On Sun, Jul 5, 2020, 6:12 PM Chris Johns <<a href="mailto:chrisj@rtems.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">chrisj@rtems.org</a>> wrote:<br>
>>><br>
>>> On 6/7/20 12:47 am, Heinz Junkes wrote:<br>
>>> > Thank you, this is exactly where I was unsure.<br>
>>> > @Chris: Can you give a recommendation here?<br>
>>> > Danke Heinz<br>
>>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
>>> > Fritz-Haber-Institut | Phone: (+49 30) 8413-4270<br>
>>> > Heinz Junkes | Fax (G3+G4): (+49 30) 8413-5900<br>
>>> > Faradayweg 4-6 | VC: <a href="mailto:102220181216@bjn.vc" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">102220181216@bjn.vc</a><br>
>>> > D - 14195 Berlin | E-Mail: <a href="mailto:junkes@fhi-berlin.mpg.de" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">junkes@fhi-berlin.mpg.de</a><br>
>>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
>>> ><br>
>>> >> On 5. Jul 2020, at 16:20, Gedare Bloom <<a href="mailto:gedare@rtems.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">gedare@rtems.org</a>> wrote:<br>
>>> >><br>
>>> >> On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 1:18 PM Mritunjay Sharma<br>
>>> >> <<a href="mailto:mritunjaysharma394@gmail.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">mritunjaysharma394@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>>> >>><br>
>>> >>><br>
>>> >>><br>
>>> >>> On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 12:28 AM Heinz Junkes <<a href="mailto:junkes@fhi-berlin.mpg.de" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">junkes@fhi-berlin.mpg.de</a>> wrote:<br>
>>> >>>><br>
>>> >>>> Hello, Mritunjay,<br>
>>> >>>> that's good news. Don't you want to try to develop a rsb-set for exactly this combination of RTEMS4.10 and EPICS7?<br>
>>> >>><br>
>>> >>><br>
>>> >>> Sure, I am ready to do this and then do it with RTEMS5 in the same way. Please tell how to begin or some existing similar<br>
>>> >>> work that can guide me how to proceed further in relation to rsb-set for RTEMS4.10 and EPICS7.<br>
>>> >>><br>
>>> >><br>
>>> >> I don't know if this is best. RSB didn't exist in 4.10. I haven't<br>
>>> >> looked to see how well the rtems-source-builder/4.10 would support a<br>
>>> >> package build. It should be discussed with Chris probably. A couple of<br>
>>> >> packages were added in the 4.11 branch.<br>
>>><br>
>>> I would leave 4.10 and move on. It may work but these things can expose issues<br>
>>> that turn into distractions.<br>
>>><br>
>>> Would making a script that does the build so we can document the steps be worth<br>
>>> while<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> Yes. Emphatically yes. We need to make sure we know how it is best built by hand to automate it.<br>
>><br>
>> I firmly believe you should not attempt to automate something until doing it manually is well understood and documented.<br>
>><br>
>> After you have this down for one BSP, we need to ask questions like:<br>
>><br>
>> + Is there any per BSP tailoring beyond the obviod architecture and compilation settings?<br>
>><br>
>> + Any tweaks to settings users may want?<br>
>><br>
>> The manual process should include testing. The RSB is a great way to automate and ease building but it doesn't address testing the packages yet.<br>
>><br>
>> --joel<br>
>><br>
>>><br>
>>> Chris<br>
>>> _______________________________________________<br>
>>> devel mailing list<br>
>>> <a href="mailto:devel@rtems.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">devel@rtems.org</a><br>
>>> <a href="http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel</a><br>
>><br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> devel mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:devel@rtems.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">devel@rtems.org</a><br>
>> <a href="http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel</a><br>
</blockquote></div></div></div>