<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name="ProgId" content="Word.Document"><meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 11"><meta name="Originator" content="Microsoft Word 11"><link rel="File-List" href="file:///C:%5CDOCUME%7E1%5Cxur%5CLOCALS%7E1%5CTemp%5Cmsohtml1%5C01%5Cclip_filelist.xml"><style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:ËÎÌå;
panose-1:2 1 6 0 3 1 1 1 1 1;
mso-font-alt:SimSun;
mso-font-charset:134;
mso-generic-font-family:auto;
mso-font-pitch:variable;
mso-font-signature:3 135135232 16 0 262145 0;}
@font-face
{font-family:"\@ËÎÌå";
panose-1:2 1 6 0 3 1 1 1 1 1;
mso-font-charset:134;
mso-generic-font-family:auto;
mso-font-pitch:variable;
mso-font-signature:3 135135232 16 0 262145 0;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{mso-style-parent:"";
margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
text-align:justify;
text-justify:inter-ideograph;
mso-pagination:none;
font-size:10.5pt;
mso-bidi-font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-fareast-font-family:ËÎÌå;
mso-font-kerning:1.0pt;}
/* Page Definitions */
@page
{mso-page-border-surround-header:no;
mso-page-border-surround-footer:no;}
@page Section1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 90.0pt 72.0pt 90.0pt;
mso-header-margin:36.0pt;
mso-footer-margin:36.0pt;
mso-paper-source:0;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">I do not think this project's objective is
to separate&obsolete newlibc from RTEMS. The objective is offer a way to
configure RTEMS that newlibc can be separated for some circumstance. (In fact, current
RTEMS can not run on a CPU with 48K_SRAM + 256K_FlashRom with minium
configuration, however something like threadx can be configured down to 2kb.)</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">It is true the biggest consumers of RTEMS are
using SPARC, and got enough SDRAM. There are lots of potential users using ARM
and want a RTOS with TCP/IP on a system with less than 100KB storage space.</span></p>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2008/5/8 Ralf Corsepius <<a href="mailto:ralf.corsepius@rtems.org" target="_blank">ralf.corsepius@rtems.org</a>>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div><br>
On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 15:26 +0800, ÑÖíµ wrote:<br>
> 2008/5/8, Ralf Corsepius <<a href="mailto:ralf.corsepius@rtems.org" target="_blank">ralf.corsepius@rtems.org</a>>:<br>
> ><br>
> > On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 14:54 +0800, ÑÖíµ wrote:<br>
> > > Hi,<br>
> > ><br>
> > > I am trying to disable newlibc.c reentrant support.<br>
> > Why do you want to do this?<br>
><br>
> That is one of the size reduction ideas of tiny rtems project.<br>
<br>
</div>OK, in verbose: What you are doing is absurd. It means to cut-off rtems<br>
from newlib, turning all of newlib and the whole compiler unusable.<br>
<div><div></div><div><br>
Ralf<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
rtems-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:rtems-users@rtems.com" target="_blank">rtems-users@rtems.com</a><br>
<a href="http://rtems.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-users" target="_blank">http://rtems.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-users</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Thanks & Best Regards!<br><br>Ray, Xu