Please disregards my last e-mail. I was able to figure it out.<div><br></div><div>However, what I get now when using the following line:</div><div><br></div><div><i>../rtems-4.10.2/configure --target=avr-rtems4.10 --enable-rtemsbsp=avrtest --enable-cxx --enable-tests=samples</i></div>
<div><br></div><div>is:</div><div>[...]</div><div><div><i>configure: error: no acceptable cc found in $PATH</i></div><div><i>make[2]: *** [avrtest] Error 1</i></div><div><i>make[2]: Leaving directory `/c/opt/rtems-4.10/rtems4.10-build/avr-rtems4.10/c'</i></div>
<div><i>make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1</i></div><div><i>make[1]: Leaving directory `/c/opt/rtems-4.10/rtems4.10-build/avr-rtems4.10/c'</i></div><div><i>make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1</i></div><div><br></div>
<div>
Please help.</div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Binkowski, Cassio <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:cassioiks@gmail.com">cassioiks@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
When I type in the last line required to build RTEMS:<div><pre style="padding-right:1em;padding-left:1em;border-bottom-width:1px;padding-top:1em;border-top-style:dashed;border-right-style:dashed;padding-bottom:1em;border-bottom-color:rgb(47,111,171);border-top-width:1px;border-bottom-style:dashed;line-height:1.1em;border-left-color:rgb(47,111,171);border-top-color:rgb(47,111,171);border-right-color:rgb(47,111,171);border-left-style:dashed;border-right-width:1px;border-left-width:1px">
make install</pre><div><br></div><div>And most of what shows in the prompt screen is:</div><div><br></div><div><div>make[3]: Leaving directory `/opt/rtems-4.11/rtems4.11-build/avr-rtems4.11/c'</div><div>make[2]: Leaving directory `/opt/rtems-4.11/rtems4.11-build/avr-rtems4.11/c'</div>
<div>make[1]: Leaving directory `/opt/rtems-4.11/rtems4.11-build/avr-rtems4.11/c'</div><div>make[1]: Entering directory `/opt/rtems-4.11/rtems4.11-build'</div><div>make[2]: Entering directory `/opt/rtems-4.11/rtems4.11-build'</div>
<div>make[2]: Nothing to be done for `install-exec-am'.</div><div>make[2]: Nothing to be done for `install-data-am'.</div><div>make[2]: Leaving directory `/opt/rtems-4.11/rtems4.11-build'</div><div>make[1]: Leaving directory `/opt/rtems-4.11/rtems4.11-build'</div>
</div><div><br></div><div>Is it right or not?</div><div><br></div><div>P.S: I have bootstrapped it.</div><div><div class="h5"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Chris Johns <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:chrisj@rtems.org" target="_blank">chrisj@rtems.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>On 23/02/12 11:55 AM, Binkowski, Cassio wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Oh, I understand.<br>
<br>
I actually installed RTEMS 4.9, as the wiki said. But the code was 4.10.2.<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
The wiki was out of date and the information wrong. The fact it worked was just luck.<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>
I don't think I understand what you mean by tools in the installer, but<br>
I used DOS to build it. A few lines to unzip RTEMS and a few more others<br></div>
to /make/ it.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
The tools came in a single executable which is an installer. This is what I mean.<div><br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
I have uninstalled and erased previous version and downloaded the new<br>
one, so I can build it again.<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
Great.<div><br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
This time, I have downloaded only AVR tools for RTEMS 4.10 installation.<br>
But I'm still with the 4.10.2 RTEMS tar. Is that ok?<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
Yes this is much much better. The fact 4.10.2 built with the 4.9 tools is an accident. I doubt any of the code would have run. The C library would have mismatches.<span><font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
Chris<br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>