<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000099">
<p>Hello Daniel,</p>
<p>thanks a lot for that very valuable information giving a rough
idea on the schedule that is around the GRLIB drivers
developments. This will help me foresee when we can plan our SW
delivery. This will hopefully modify our delivery scheme :
deliver a single core software first in compliance with our
current planning, and foresee a SMP software afterwards.<br>
</p>
<p>In the mean time, I had a quick look at the grspw_pkt driver and
I tried to compile it in an SMP environment. However, the
compilation failed on the unknown macro 'rtems_interrupt_enable'
which is only defined in a single core environment. It seems that
the grspw_ptk driver does not use the
'rtems_interrupt_local_enable' macro which is defined in an SMP
environment only.<br>
</p>
<p>This makes me wonder if the grspw_pkt driver is SMP ready. Can
you confirm if this is the case, or not ? Is the latest grspw_pkt
driver available in the RTEMS git repository ?</p>
<p>Thanks in advance for your answers,</p>
<p>kind regards,</p>
<p>Charles</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le 17.10.2016 ā 09:18, Daniel Hellstrom
a écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:fac0d96e-5f76-3437-6d91-339cc4812a89@gaisler.com"
type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<p>Hello Charles,</p>
<p>We are planning to resume our effort on RTEMS-4.11 in Q4 2016.
At this point we are planning to make fixes and improvements for
the GRLIB drivers like the issue brought up here, this is known
to us.</p>
<p>When it comes to the GRSPW driver in particular, we recommend
users to adopt to the new GRSPW packet driver (grspw_pkt.c)
since it offers significantly better performance, flexibility
and more functionality. During 2016 we have been working on
enhancing the GRSPW packet driver for SMP and making it SMP
safe. For example better semaphore handling to allow TX and RX
operations in parallel without locking each other, and custom
ISR/work-task set up to allow multiple work-task (or none) to
utilize multiple CPU cores better and isolation etc. Some
patches have been going into the RCC-1.2.x only and some are not
completed yet, when completed we will also upstream them.</p>
<p>Best Regards,<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">Daniel Hellstrom
Software Section Head
Cobham Gaisler
T : +46 (0) 31 775 8657
F : +46 (0) 31 421407
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:daniel.hellstrom@gaisler.com">daniel.hellstrom@gaisler.com</a>
Cobham Gaisler AB, Kungsgatan 12, SE-411 19, GÖTEBORG, Sweden.
+46 (0) 31 775 8650, <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.cobham.com/gaisler">www.cobham.com/gaisler</a>
Please consider the environment before printing this email
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it ("E-mail") is intended solely for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information. If you are not the addressee(s), any disclosure,
reproduction, copying, distribution or other use of the E-mail is prohibited. If you have received this E-mail in error, please delete it and notify the sender immediately via our switchboard or return e-mail.
Neither the company nor any subsidiary or affiliate or associated company nor any individual sending this Email accepts any liability in respect of the content (including errors and omissions) nor shall this e-mail be deemed to enter the company or any subsidiary or affiliate or associated company into a contract or to create any legally binding obligations unless expressly agreed to in writing under separate cover and timeliness of the E-mail which arise as a result of transmission. If verification is required, please request a hard copy version from the sender. </pre>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2016-10-14 07:53, Sebastian Huber
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:733681531.9880.1476424416115.JavaMail.zimbra@embedded-brains.de"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hello Charles,
most of the Gaisler drivers are not SMP ready. You can ask the Gaisler support to fix this or you do it yourself. I am not sure what Gaisler has in mind with its drivers. It should be fairly straight forward to do this provided you have access to the hardware. Please have a look at
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://docs.rtems.org/doc-current/share/rtems/html/c_user/Symmetric-Multiprocessing-Services-Disable-Interrupts-and-Interrupt-Locks.html#Symmetric-Multiprocessing-Services-Disable-Interrupts-and-Interrupt-Locks">https://docs.rtems.org/doc-current/share/rtems/html/c_user/Symmetric-Multiprocessing-Services-Disable-Interrupts-and-Interrupt-Locks.html#Symmetric-Multiprocessing-Services-Disable-Interrupts-and-Interrupt-Locks</a>
and section 2 in
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://microelectronics.esa.int/ngmp/RTEMS-SMP-StatusReportEmbBrains-2015-10.pdf">http://microelectronics.esa.int/ngmp/RTEMS-SMP-StatusReportEmbBrains-2015-10.pdf</a>
----- Am 12. Okt 2016 um 15:30 schrieb Charles INGELS <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:charles.ingels@syderal.ch">charles.ingels@syderal.ch</a>:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Dear all,
I am trying to setup and to use the GR Spacewire driver in an SMP RTEMS
application.
I activate the GRSPW driver by defining the following constant :
...
#define CONFIGURE_DRIVER_AMBAPP_GAISLER_GRSPW
#include <drvmgr/drvmgr_confdefs.h>
...
I also define SMP context by writing :
...
#define CONFIGURE_SMP_APPLICATION
#define CONFIGURE_SMP_MAXIMUM_PROCESSORS 2
#define CONFIGURE_SCHEDULER_PRIORITY_AFFINITY_SMP
#include <rtems/confdefs.h>
...
Note that SMP works fine on my LEON3 evaluation board and I am able to
play with tasks affinities.
Finally, I rely on the driver manager to setup the drivers I want to use.
When I compile my application, I get an unresolved symbol error related
to the following function (macro in fact):
...../rtems/c/src/lib/libbsp/sparc/leon3/../../sparc/shared/spw/grspw.c:1846:
undefined reference to `rtems_interrupt_disable'
After investigating a little bit more, it appears that such macro is
only defined if the RTEMS_SMP symbol is not defined. In other words,
such macro is only defined on a mono-core configuration, while in a
multi-core configuration, the macro rtems_interrupt_disable shall not be
used and shall be replaced by the macrortems_interrupt_local_disable.
However, the grspw driver relies on the mono-core macro
rtems_interrupt_disable. Since it is not defined in my SMP
configuration, the compilation fails.
So, my question is : is the grspw driver multi-core ready or is there
some work to do to have it work in a multi-core configuration ?
Thanks for your help,
Charles
--
*Charles INGELS*
Embedded software expert
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:charles.ingels@syderal.ch">charles.ingels@syderal.ch</a>
Phone /+41 (0)32 338 99 10/
iNum /+883 5100 0902 7759/
*SYDERAL SA*
Neuenburgstrasse 7
CH-3238 Gals (Suisse)
Desk /+41 (0)32 338 98 00/
Fax /+41 (0)32 338 99 34/
Web site <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.syderal.ch">http://www.syderal.ch</a>
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:users@rtems.org">users@rtems.org</a>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users">http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
users mailing list
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:users@rtems.org">users@rtems.org</a>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users">http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>