[Bug 1204] sigset_t type change proposal

[rtems-bugs at rtems.org]

http://www.rtems.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1204





------- Comment #1 from joel.sherrill at oarcorp.com  2007-01-09 12:09 -------
What type of ambiguity does it cause?  Is the definition not compliant?  

We only want 32 bits of signals.  I can see changing it to a uint32_t to be C99
clean but discussions on the list a while back came to the consensus that a 32
bit signal set was sufficient.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.rtems.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.