[Bug 1727] Reading of timestamps is not atomic in general

bugzilla-daemon at rtems.org bugzilla-daemon at rtems.org
Tue Dec 21 14:25:33 UTC 2010


https://www.rtems.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1727

--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> 2010-12-21 08:25:33 CST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> There is currently no _Timestamp_Get method.  Are you proposing to add one that
> is atomic?

Yes, we have no _Timestamp_Get() method currently, and we need one.

> If so, there will also need to be a _Timestamp_Get_unprotected.

Ok.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://www.rtems.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.



More information about the bugs mailing list