[Bug 1727] Reading of timestamps is not atomic in general
bugzilla-daemon at rtems.org
bugzilla-daemon at rtems.org
Tue Dec 21 14:25:33 UTC 2010
https://www.rtems.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1727
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> 2010-12-21 08:25:33 CST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> There is currently no _Timestamp_Get method. Are you proposing to add one that
> is atomic?
Yes, we have no _Timestamp_Get() method currently, and we need one.
> If so, there will also need to be a _Timestamp_Get_unprotected.
Ok.
--
Configure bugmail: https://www.rtems.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
More information about the bugs
mailing list