[Bug 1635] Refactor Priority bit map handling

[bugzilla-daemon at rtems.org]

https://www.rtems.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1635

--- Comment #8 from Gedare <giddyup44 at yahoo.com> 2010-07-28 09:13:03 CDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #6)
> > I am against to introduce new *.inl files.  I don't know why we have all these
> > *.inl files.  I guess this is some relict of an old hack.
> If a handler uses inline routines, the *.inl files are one-to-one with the
> handler's *.h file.  The inline routines are not exported to the application
> level, which I guess is why they are separated from the header files.  .

I could put all of the bit-map implementations in the priority.h / priority.inl
if that is preferred. This change can easily be done later too, to cut down on
header file duplication.  The only issue I see with doing that is possibly
defining global variables that are otherwise not necessary.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://www.rtems.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.