[RTEMS Project] #3250: Remove Use of bsp_specs
RTEMS trac
trac at rtems.org
Tue Nov 21 19:27:53 UTC 2017
#3250: Remove Use of bsp_specs
---------------------------+------------------------
Reporter: Joel Sherrill | Owner: (none)
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Indefinite
Component: admin | Version: 5
Severity: normal | Keywords:
---------------------------+------------------------
The bsp_specs file in each BSP directory is GCC specific and a barrier to
supporting other compilers including clang/llvm. The bsp_specs file is
used in a variety of ways including some odd build system dependencies and
this ticket is to track eliminating those uses and the direct use of
bsp_specs themselves for extending GCC options.
The primary use of the bsp_specs file is to extend GCC's notion of what to
link with. The bsp_specs itself commonly specifies:
* start.o file
* program entry point
* crt[in].o or crtbegin.o/crtend.o
* linker script
* Frequently, arguments which are implicitly passed to ld.
This is typical and from a recently added BSP:
{{{
%rename endfile old_endfile
%rename startfile old_startfile
%rename link old_link
*startfile:
%{!qrtems: %(old_startfile)} \
%{!nostdlib: %{qrtems: start.o%s crti.o%s crtbegin.o%s -e _start}}
*link:
%{!qrtems: %(old_link)} %{qrtems: -dc -dp -N}
*endfile:
%{!qrtems: %(old_endfiles)} %{qrtems: crtend.o%s crtn.o%s }
}}}
Note that it has the implicit "-dc -dp -N" arguments which are passed to
ld.
The -dc and -dp options are equivalent and assign space to common symbols
even with linking with -r. Why these two options are included is a mystery
lost to time. Similarly the -N sets the .text and .data sections to be
readable and writable and do NOT page align the data segment. This option
is also a blast from the ancient past and likely should not be used.
The "-qrtems" option is used with this pattern when compiling and linking
RTEMS programs:
{{{
-B${PREFIX}/${BSP}/lib/ -specs bsp_specs -qrtems
}}}
The -B says that the following directory is a system directory. It is
treated as a "lib" directory and is also assumed to have an include/
subdirectory. They are added to the linker and include search paths,
respectfully. The -specs option references the bsp_specs and adds the
-qrtems options which are then tripped by specifying -qrtems. Every part
of this must be eliminated and performed in a manner that is more amenable
to using a compiler other than GCC.
In order to eliminate the bsp_specs, the arguments used in each BSP's
version will have to be reviewed, made common, and then eliminated. A
similar effort was performed when the BSP specific make-exe rules were
eliminated from the "make/custom" files and a common pattern was put in
place.
In addition to using the bsp_specs to specify details about linking and
include files, the build system has quite a few odd dependencies on the
presence of bsp_specs:
* all BSP configure.ac use bsp_specs like this:
{{{
AC_CONFIG_SRCDIR([bsp_specs])
}}}
The idea was that this was a unique file to ensure the script was in the
right directory. This can be changed to use a specfic make/custom/*.cfg
file and not lose any integrity checking.
* all BSP Makefile.am have this:
{{{
dist_project_lib_DATA = bsp_specs
}}}
That can just be removed when we don't use the file.
* ./aclocal/check-bsps.m4 uses it to see if it is BSP directory
* bootstrap uses it generate the list of BSP directories for the
libbsp/*/acinclude.m4 files
* Other references are either comments or obvious uses of it in
some invocation of GCC.
--
Ticket URL: <http://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3250>
RTEMS Project <http://www.rtems.org/>
RTEMS Project
More information about the bugs
mailing list