[RTEMS Project] #4675: sleep should be a thread cancellation point

[RTEMS trac]

#4675: sleep should be a thread cancellation point
------------------------------+--------------------
  Reporter:  Alexandre Oliva  |      Owner:  (none)
      Type:  defect           |     Status:  new
  Priority:  normal           |  Milestone:
 Component:  admin            |    Version:  6
  Severity:  normal           |   Keywords:
Blocked By:                   |   Blocking:
------------------------------+--------------------
 GCC has worked around, in the libstdc++ testsuite, the fact that nanosleep
 (as well as sleep and clock_nanosleep) should be thread cancellation
 points, per POSIX, but RTEMS may want to make them so.
 https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-June/597003.html

 (I haven't checked that other functions that should be thread cancellation
 points are, I only noticed that this one wasn't, and decided to file this
 ticket because for other issues in which I explicitly identified RTEMS I
 got a request to do so)

--
Ticket URL: <http://devel.rtems.org/ticket/4675>
RTEMS Project <http://www.rtems.org/>
RTEMS Project