RTEMS | Draft: libtests/stackchk04: Add a new testsuite for the detailed reporter (!161)

[Kinsey Moore (@opticron)]

Kinsey Moore started a new discussion on testsuites/libtests/stackchk04/stackchk04.doc: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/161#note_110489

 > +# INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN
 > +# CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE)
 > +# ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE
 > +# POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
 > +#
 > +
 > +This file describes the directives and concepts tested by this test set.
 > +
 > +test set name: stackchk04
 > +
 > +directives:
 > +  + rtems_stack_checker_switch_extension
 > +
 > +concepts:
 > +  + This task verifies that the stack checker will call the default quite 
 > +    reporter function.

Doesn't this test explicitly define the detailed reporter function?

-- 
View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/161#note_110489
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/bugs/attachments/20240805/b814e545/attachment-0001.htm>