RTEMS | libmisc/stackchk: Add stack smashing protection (!277)
Gedare Bloom (@gedare)
gitlab at rtems.org
Wed Dec 18 20:29:33 UTC 2024
Merge request https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/277 was reviewed by Gedare Bloom
--
Gedare Bloom started a new discussion on cpukit/libmisc/shell/main_stackuse.c: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/277#note_116997
> #include <rtems/shell.h>
> #include <rtems/score/threadimpl.h>
> +#include <rtems/score/basedefs.h>
What's this include added for?
--
Gedare Bloom started a new discussion on cpukit/libmisc/shell/main_stackuse.c: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/277#note_116998
> - *
> + * COPYRIGHT (c) 1989-2008 On-Line Applications Research Corporation (OAR).
> + * COPYRIGHT (c) 2024 Mohamed Hassan <muhammad.hamdy.hassan at gmail.com>
Adding a single include line is probably not copyrightable.
--
Gedare Bloom started a new discussion on cpukit/libmisc/stackchk/check.c: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/277#note_116999
> + * at the application
> + */
> +RTEMS_WEAK RTEMS_NO_RETURN void __stack_chk_fail(void)
Does something define this as a prototype? I expect this would cause warnings in the build.
--
Gedare Bloom started a new discussion on testsuites/libtests/stackchk05/init.c: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/277#note_117000
> + invoke_stack_overflows();
> +
> + rtems_test_exit();
This is wrong and won't compile. How did you test this code?
--
View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/277
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/bugs/attachments/20241218/547653cf/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the bugs
mailing list