RTEMS Waf | Follow-up from "Spellcheck." (#2)

[Amar Takhar (@amar)]

Amar Takhar created an issue: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/tools/rtems_waf/-/issues/2



Trying out the 'resolve threads in an issue' feature.  I should have done this before.  These need to be addressed still.

The following discussions from !2 should be addressed:

- [ ] @joel started a [discussion](https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/tools/rtems_waf/-/merge_requests/2#note_108725 "Spellcheck."): (+1 comment)

  > I think executables is still plural. You can build multiple.
- [ ] @joel started a [discussion](https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/tools/rtems_waf/-/merge_requests/2#note_108726 "Spellcheck."): (+1 comment)

  > We used the erc32 as the example for over two decades but the erc32 is now out of production and we switched to the leon3 for the Getting Started and GSoC Hello World. Perhaps it is time to switch to the leon3 here also.
- [ ] @joel started a [discussion](https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/tools/rtems_waf/-/merge_requests/2#note_108727 "Spellcheck."): (+1 comment)

  > Interesting that this references rtems 5 but 5 is still autoconf. Should this all be switched to 6? This change is directed at main which makes that seem like the right answer.
- [ ] @joel started a [discussion](https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/tools/rtems_waf/-/merge_requests/2#note_108728 "Spellcheck."): (+1 comment)

  > Again with rtems5.
- [ ] @joel started a [discussion](https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/tools/rtems_waf/-/merge_requests/2#note_108729 "Spellcheck."): (+1 comment)

  > More 5
- [ ] @joel started a [discussion](https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/tools/rtems_waf/-/merge_requests/2#note_108730 "Spellcheck."): (+1 comment)

  > rtems-examples has more waf application examples. Probably worth a reference. For more examples, ...

-- 
View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/tools/rtems_waf/-/issues/2
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/bugs/attachments/20240707/7010b319/attachment.htm>