RTEMS | membench: Add memory benchmark programs (!110)

Chris Johns (@chris) gitlab at rtems.org
Tue Jul 16 06:00:24 UTC 2024




Chris Johns commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/110#note_109361


I appreciate the work and decisions made during the pressure of the pre-qual work. I left `rtems-central` alone so that work could proceed. I felt there was enough complexity without added oversight and oversight from someone not directly involved. I am sorry if you feel you are being tied in knots, it is not the intention.

Tools in `rtems-central` and code in `rtems.git` only accessed and used by those tools creates a hole.

Why not hold these tests with the qual stuff with the code that can handle them? I accepted the validation tests into `rtems.git` because `rtems-test` can report a pass or fail.

-- 
View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/110#note_109361
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/bugs/attachments/20240716/e4eaeb7a/attachment.htm>


More information about the bugs mailing list