RTEMS | membench: Add memory benchmark programs (!110)
Chris Johns (@chris)
gitlab at rtems.org
Tue Jul 16 06:00:24 UTC 2024
Chris Johns commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/110#note_109361
I appreciate the work and decisions made during the pressure of the pre-qual work. I left `rtems-central` alone so that work could proceed. I felt there was enough complexity without added oversight and oversight from someone not directly involved. I am sorry if you feel you are being tied in knots, it is not the intention.
Tools in `rtems-central` and code in `rtems.git` only accessed and used by those tools creates a hole.
Why not hold these tests with the qual stuff with the code that can handle them? I accepted the validation tests into `rtems.git` because `rtems-test` can report a pass or fail.
--
View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/110#note_109361
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/bugs/attachments/20240716/e4eaeb7a/attachment.htm>
More information about the bugs
mailing list