RTEMS | Draft: Feature/stack reporter config (!86)

Kinsey Moore (@opticron) gitlab at rtems.org
Fri Jul 26 00:30:41 UTC 2024




Kinsey Moore started a new discussion: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/86#note_109910


I think this is missing some of your local changes or you have some stale build artifacts that aren't being regenerated correctly. Both stackchk.exe and stackchk03.exe produce the default "BLOWN STACK!!!" output and stackchk.exe would fail to build if it were being built according to your comment since it is missing the reference to stackchk03_blown_stack_reporter that is only compiled into stackchk03.exe.

-- 
View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/86#note_109910
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/bugs/attachments/20240726/effad040/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the bugs mailing list