RTEMS | Draft: Feature/stack reporter config (!86)

[Joel Sherrill (@joel)]

Merge request https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/86 was reviewed by Joel Sherrill

--
  
Joel Sherrill started a new discussion on testsuites/libtests/stackchk03/stackchk03.scn: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/86#note_110040

 > +*** TEST STACKCHK03 ***
 > +custom stack check report!
 > +*** END OF TEST STACKCHK03 ***

No newline at the end of file.

--
  
Joel Sherrill started a new discussion on testsuites/libtests/stackchk03/system.h: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/86#note_110041

 > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause */
 > +
 > +/* system.h

Update all file headers in stackchk and stackchk03 to follow the proper style. SPDX, then Doxygen file block, then license block -- as separate comment blocks. You have to be careful that comments and the license do not intermix or show up in Doxygen output together.

--
  
Joel Sherrill started a new discussion on testsuites/libtests/stackchk03/system.h: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/86#note_110042

 > +/* global variables */
 > +
 > +/* end of include file */

No newline at end of file.

--
  
Joel Sherrill started a new discussion on spec/build/testsuites/libtests/stackchk03.yml: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/86#note_110043

 > +- testsuites/libtests/stackchk/blow.c
 > +- testsuites/libtests/stackchk/init.c
 > +- testsuites/libtests/stackchk/task1.c

In the edits I sent you, I added a config.c to both stackchk and stackchk03 so they could instantiate the configuration differently. Why doesn't that show up here?




-- 
View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/86
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/bugs/attachments/20240726/d3082917/attachment.htm>