RTEMS | Improve event record handling (!282)

[Sebastian Huber (@sebhub)]

Sebastian Huber commented on a discussion on cpukit/include/rtems/recordclient.h: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/282#note_114253

 >  );
 >  
 >  typedef struct {
 > -  /**
 > -   * @brief Event time to uptime maintenance.
 > -   */
 > -  struct {
 > -    uint64_t bt;
 > -    uint32_t time_at_bt;
 > -    uint32_t time_last;
 > -    uint32_t time_accumulated;
 > -  } uptime;
 > +  uint64_t uptime_bt;

In this isolated spot yes, however, the `_bt` abbreviation is used several times in this code area.

-- 
View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/282#note_114253
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/bugs/attachments/20241103/4f987adf/attachment.htm>