RTEMS | build: Report normal Git hash (!288)

[Amar Takhar (@amar)]

Amar Takhar commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/288#note_115132


We could just keep what we have short and also store the full hash as much as cutting it makes sense if the argument is the git hash could change in the future then what's "short" could change, too.  So I would store both a pre-shortened version that we use and also store the full hash for others to use in production.

-- 
View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/288#note_115132
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/bugs/attachments/20241117/d8e71025/attachment-0001.htm>