RTEMS | Improve arm/xilinx-zynqmp-rpu BSP familiy (!230)

Tue Oct 1 23:45:24 UTC 2024

Kinsey Moore commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/230#note_112754

Reading from the above, I think the naming suggested was zynqmp_rpu_lockstep, zynqmp_rpu_split_0, and zynqmp_rpu_split_1 which is fine with me. It'd be nice to make the primary/secondary more explicit like in Chris's suggestion, but that's far beyond the scope of this MR.

-- 
View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/230#note_112754
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/bugs/attachments/20241001/de7884b9/attachment.htm>