Integration | Choosing an RBSP. (#12)

[Chris Johns (@chris)]

Chris Johns commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.rtems.org/administration/integration/-/issues/12#note_111971


QEMU is great when it builds and works. A number of QEMU ports are held in forked repos, eg Xilinx that makes things harder. The Zynq QEMU BSP is good for network development and test and does work for `rtems-test` but there are timing issues on loaded machines with QEMU. @opticron has looked into this and understands the issue more than me. The ticks come in a burst if missed and screws with the realtime timing. Also on QEMU is the console receive does not work for that BSP. Any way I think you get the idea QEMU is big and complicated and full of features and this complicates getting it working.

The idea behind using SIS is its simplicity for long term CI testing.

-- 
View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/administration/integration/-/issues/12#note_111971
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/bugs/attachments/20240912/b43f90b7/attachment.htm>