RTEMS | Improve and simplify SMP start (!235)

[Chris Johns (@chris)]

Merge request https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/235 was reviewed by Chris Johns

--
  
Chris Johns started a new discussion on bsps/arm/altera-cyclone-v/start/bspsmp.c: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/235#note_112700

 >  {
 > -  bool started;
 > +  _Assert(cpu_index == 1);

Why only start cpu 1?

--
  
Chris Johns started a new discussion on cpukit/include/rtems/score/smpimpl.h: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/235#note_112701

 > + * The waiting is done without a timeout.  If secondary processors cannot reach
 > + * this state, then it is expected that they indicate this failure with an
 > + * ::SMP_MESSAGE_SHUTDOWN message or reset the system.

Is this what happens or is it something that should be done?


-- 
View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/235
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/bugs/attachments/20240929/d741b7e0/attachment-0001.htm>