RTEMS | Add timespec_get() support to RTEMS (!670)

[Sebastian Huber (@sebhub)]

Sebastian Huber commented on a discussion on cpukit/posix/src/timespecget.c: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/670#note_129124

 > + * AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
 > + * IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
 > + * ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE
 > + * LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR
 > + * CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF
 > + * SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS
 > + * INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN
 > + * CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE)
 > + * ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE
 > + * POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
 > + */
 > +
 > +#ifdef HAVE_CONFIG_H
 > +#include "config.h"
 > +#endif
 > +

I would not rely on implicit includes. You implement a C language library function declared by \<time.h\>. Everything else are implementation details.

-- 
View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/670#note_129124
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/bugs/attachments/20250821/96a5a4ed/attachment-0001.htm>