RTEMS | Add timespec_get() support to RTEMS (!670)
mazen Adel (@mez3n)
gitlab at rtems.org
Fri Aug 22 21:58:47 UTC 2025
mazen Adel commented on a discussion on testsuites/psxtests/psxtimes01/init.c: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/670#note_129312
> rtems_test_assert( end_tm.tms_cstime == 0 );
> +}
> +
> +static void test_timespec_functions( void )
> +{
> + struct timespec start_ts;
> + struct timespec end_ts;
> + struct timespec clock_ts;
> + int result;
> + int interval = 5;
> +
> + puts( "\n*** Testing timespec_get() functions ***" );
> +
> + puts( "timespec_get( NULL, TIME_UTC ) -- EINVAL" );
> + result = timespec_get( NULL, TIME_UTC );
> + rtems_test_assert( result == 0 );
Nothing about the errors was written in either [Posix Issue 8 docs ](https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9799919799/functions/timespec_get.html)or [C11 docs](https://en.cppreference.com/w/c/chrono/timespec_get), [Linux](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man3/timespec_get.3.html) however said not to depend on a return value. So we can either set `errno = EINVAL` or not which depends on your opinion. If not I should change the comment because it is misleading.
--
View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/670#note_129312
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/bugs/attachments/20250822/675f791a/attachment.htm>
More information about the bugs
mailing list