RTEMS | Draft: confdefs: Improve CONFIGURE_MAXIMUM_PRIORITY (!436)

[Chris Johns (@chris)]

Chris Johns commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/436#note_120250


I am sorry but I view not supporting by default the historical value of `255` as a regression and any application that now depends on the EDF value is unfortunately broken. Those apps will need to add the define.

The fact the change happened a while ago and was not noticed does not validate it. It just means it needs to be fixed now.

-- 
View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/436#note_120250
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/bugs/attachments/20250226/bd6afe8a/attachment.htm>