GitLab | Workflow for contrib projects (#99)

[Christian Mauderer (@c-mauderer)]

Christian Mauderer commented: https://gitlab.rtems.org/administration/gitlab/-/issues/99#note_124477


I haven't been in the discussion in the meeting (the weeklies are at 0:00 for me) and therefore I most likely missed the details and advantages of the procedure that have been discussed there.

- Which projects are we talking about? Tool projects like `gcc` where RTEMS-contributors heavily contribute to the parts related to RTEMS? Or any arbitrary library that someone is using with RTEMS and where a small 5 line patch is sent?
- Who decides what is on behalf of the project and what is a contribution done by an individual?
- Is an upstream project aware of the workflow? If yes: What is the difference for them if someone followed that workflow?
- If it's not a difference for an upstream project: What's the advantage for us or the upstream project?

-- 
View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/administration/gitlab/-/issues/99#note_124477
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/bugs/attachments/20250612/6746ac83/attachment-0001.htm>