RTEMS | testsuites/psxtests: Added API header OK tests for posix 8 functions to be implemented in GSoC25 (!497)

[mazen Adel (@mez3n)]

mazen Adel commented on a discussion on testsuites/psxtests/psxhdrs/dlfcn/dladdr.c: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/497#note_124514

 > + *    documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
 > + *
 > + * THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS "AS IS"
 > + * AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
 > + * IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
 > + * ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE
 > + * LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR
 > + * CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF
 > + * SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS
 > + * INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN
 > + * CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE)
 > + * ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE
 > + * POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
 > + */
 > +
 > +#define _NETBSD_SOURCE

Should I make a separate merge request for updating `dlfcn.h`? I'm assuming the guard will be changed to `_NETBSD_SOURCE || __POSIX_VISIBLE >= 202405` and in the test we will define both correct ?
I checked libdl and it `cpukit/libdl` and it doesn't have any references to `dladdr()`.

-- 
View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/497#note_124514
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/bugs/attachments/20250612/a6ff5069/attachment-0001.htm>