RTEMS | Add support for std::atomic on Coldfire ISA A (#5230)

[Joel Sherrill (@joel)]

Joel Sherrill created an issue: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/issues/5230



The following discussion from !433 should be addressed:

- [ ] @chris started a [discussion](https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/433#note_120263 "m68k/uC5282: Disable spcxx001"): (+1 comment)

  >>>
  1. This BSP is supported by EPICS and I suspect SLAC still has it running. I wonder if EPICS would also fail to build as it uses C++?
  2. Is this only C++ test that fails?
  3. I do not like the idea of suppressing a failure this way because it can get forgotten
  4. If we get a clean report for GCC 14 because this test is suppressed could that trigger acceptance of GCC 14? What happens to this BSP?

  >>>

  (1) Someone will have to fix gcc, etc. to support std::atomic on Coldfire ISA A
- [ ] (2) Yes.
- [ ] (3) OK. 
- [ ] (4) I'm sorry someone is still using this BSP without making sure GCC supports the CPU fully.

-- 
View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/issues/5230
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/bugs/attachments/20250313/c786a9ed/attachment-0001.htm>