RTEMS | RTEMS C Source Formatting (#35)

[Chris Johns (@chris)]

Chris Johns commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.rtems.org/groups/rtems/-/work_items/35#note_133440


Thanks. I also do not have a strong opinion but I think it is important we discuss this and have a policy in place.

Your second item is worth considering. If we need to perform maintenance in an area that has had formatting applied in later versions we could determine the extend of the back port and decide if formatting is back ported? The only problem not back porting formatting is further changes get harder.

If we have applied formatting on the development branch or a release and it is stable I think it is easier to justify back porting the format changes. I think back porting formatting changes works rather than applying formatting directly by the tool?

I assume release branches that support formatting run the formatting tool?

-- 
View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/groups/rtems/-/work_items/35#note_133440
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/bugs/attachments/20250927/c24e837a/attachment.htm>