RTEMS | Implement C11 Annex K (Bounds-checking interfaces): memset_s proof of concept (#5434)

[YASH BHIWANIA (@Yash)]

YASH BHIWANIA commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/issues/5434#note_141775


Thanks for the clarification, @joel . That makes sense—I'd prefer not to rely on upstream Newlib changes if they are uncertain.

@rurban , since isinf is often a compiler built-in, would you be open to me adding a fallback in safeclib ? I can modify the configuration to detect if isinf is missing and use \_ \_builtin_isinf (or a local helper) instead. This would solve the portability issue immediately for RTEMS

-- 
View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/issues/5434#note_141775
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/bugs/attachments/20260205/a4bc19cd/attachment-0001.htm>