RTEMS | Ported LittleFS (!1064)

[Gedare Bloom (@gedare)]

Gedare Bloom commented on a discussion on cpukit/libfs/src/littlefs/rtems-littlefs-ops.c: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/1064#note_142981

 > +  rtems_littlefs_lock(mt_entry);
 > +
 > +  new_node = calloc(1, sizeof(rtems_littlefs_node_t) + node->path_len);
 > +  if ( new_node == NULL ) {
 > +    rtems_littlefs_unlock(mt_entry);
 > +    rtems_set_errno_and_return_minus_one(ENOMEM);
 > +  }
 > +
 > +  new_node->owner = node->owner;
 > +  new_node->group = node->group;
 > +  new_node->mode = node->mode;
 > +  new_node->ctime = node->ctime;
 > +  new_node->mtime = node->mtime;
 > +  new_node->atime = node->atime;
 > +
 > +  strcpy(new_node->path, node->path);

I would recommend running the `clang-format` over the new files written for RTEMS.

-- 
View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/1064#note_142981
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/bugs/attachments/20260219/6672e8f0/attachment-0001.htm>