RTEMS | Using year 11901 in time-of-day overflows. (#5496)

[Gedare Bloom (@gedare)]

Gedare Bloom created an issue: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/issues/5496

Assignees: Joel Sherrill and Gedare Bloom

The following discussion from !339 should be addressed:

- [ ] @joel started a [discussion](https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/339#note_143024):  (+4 comments)

    > What's the rationale for 11900? What is the breaking point after that and what is it? 
    > 
    > We really need to capture the analysis for all the time types this time around. The year 2099 was baked in a long long time ago without documentation as to the rationale.

-- 
View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/issues/5496
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/bugs/attachments/20260220/987b643b/attachment-0001.htm>