RTEMS | initial BSP for Silicon Labs EFM32GG11 (!877)

Fri Jan 9 23:24:34 UTC 2026

Allan Hessenflow commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/877#note_138310

No, those modifications are not strictly necessary.  It just bugs me that they created separate include files for every chip variation when most of the variations (several package types and two temperature ratings) have no effect on the contents.  I do understand the desire to keep it as close to the upstream distribution as possible though, I could easily undo that second commit and instead change my processor.h to include arbitrarily select a certain package/temperature file for each main type.

-- 
View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/877#note_138310
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/bugs/attachments/20260109/0d88a754/attachment.htm>