RTEMS | aarch64: add rk3399_rockpro64 BSP (!894)

Thu Jan 22 22:33:08 UTC 2026

Kinsey Moore started a new discussion on bsps/aarch64/rk3399/include/bsp.h: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/894#note_139621

 > + * @name RK3399 UARTs
 > + *
 > + * @{
 > + */
 > +#define RK3399_UART_BASE 0xff180000
 > +#define RK3399_UART_SIZE 0x40000
 > +#define RK3399_UART_DEVICE_SIZE 0x10000
 > +
 > +#define RK3399_UART0_BASE (RK3399_UART_BASE + 0x00000)
 > +#define RK3399_UART0_SIZE RK3399_UART_DEVICE_SIZE
 > +#define RK3399_UART1_BASE (RK3399_UART_BASE + 0x10000)
 > +#define RK3399_UART1_SIZE RK3399_UART_DEVICE_SIZE
 > +#define RK3399_UART2_BASE (RK3399_UART_BASE + 0x20000)
 > +#define RK3399_UART2_SIZE RK3399_UART_DEVICE_SIZE
 > +#define RK3399_UART3_BASE (RK3399_UART_BASE + 0x30000)
 > +#define RK3399_UART3_SIZE RK3399_UART_DEVICE_SIZE

Is there a UART definition missing here? Documentation elsewhere indicates 5 total NS16550-compatible UARTs on this chip.

-- 
View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/894#note_139621
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/bugs/attachments/20260122/78ce9e57/attachment-0001.htm>