RTEMS | SMP: Add support for the MPCP locking protocol (!1358)

[Ivy Zhuang (@purple-affogato)]

Ivy Zhuang commented on a discussion on cpukit/include/rtems/rtems/semdata.h: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/1358#note_155166

 >  
 >  #if defined( RTEMS_SMP )
 >      MRSP_Control MRSP;
 > +    MPCP_Control MPCP;

MRSP_Control and MPCP_Control are already in the union Core_control contained by the Semaphore_Control struct, so there wouldn't need to be a union within a union. If there is already a union for the Control structs in Semaphore_Control even without RTEMS_SMP defined, then I think it doesn't make sense to go for a polymorphism approach.

-- 
View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/1358#note_155166
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org. Unsubscribe from this thread: https://gitlab.rtems.org/-/sent_notifications/4-8rojd0c23t0dbtggp7tljjbny-1d/unsubscribe | Manage all notifications: https://gitlab.rtems.org/-/profile/notifications | Help: https://gitlab.rtems.org/help


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/bugs/attachments/20260723/b92f7513/attachment.htm>