Re: RTEMS | Draft: posix: Add mq_ispriority to mq_attr for per‑queue discipline selection (!1084)

[Xinhong Hu (@aptacc2421)]

Xinhong Hu commented: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/1084#note_143896


Thank you for the feedback.

I have addressed the review comments:

- Renamed the field to mq_ispriority_np
- Removed the rtems guard
- Applied clang-format to ensure consistent formatting

Please let me know if further adjustments are needed.

-- 
View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/1084#note_143896
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/bugs/attachments/20260301/34e5b345/attachment.htm>