RTEMS | RTEMS Compliance w/ California Law AB-1043 (#5502)

[Wayne Thornton (@wmthornton-dev)]

Wayne Thornton commented: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/issues/5502#note_144461


As discussed in the meeting this evening (03/05/2026) my personal opinion is that we should implement the minimum API to comply with the laws currently in place in California and Brazil, and anticipated laws in Colorado and other jurisdictions. Make a bare-minimum compliant API and make it accessible to the RSB for the end-user to download if they need it. I'm willing to write a basic implementation in anticipation of this implementation, with feedback from others.

-- 
View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/issues/5502#note_144461
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/bugs/attachments/20260306/387092c9/attachment.htm>