RTEMS | stm32h7/bspstart: avoid overflow in HAL_GetTick calculation (!1144)
Mohamed Ayman (@mohamedayman23)
gitlab at rtems.org
Wed Mar 18 23:53:41 UTC 2026
Mohamed Ayman commented on a discussion on bsps/arm/stm32h7/start/bspstart.c: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/1144#note_146136
> /* Get number of milliseconds elapsed since startup */
> uint32_t HAL_GetTick(void)
> {
> - return rtems_clock_get_ticks_since_boot() *
> - rtems_configuration_get_milliseconds_per_tick();
> + return (uint32_t)(
> + (uint64_t) rtems_clock_get_ticks_since_boot() *
> + rtems_configuration_get_milliseconds_per_tick()
> +);
I added a command to identify all places where HAL_GetTick() is used in a rollover-safe manner using the standard subtraction idiom. This ensures any 32-bit wraparound of the tick counter is handled correctly.
the command: **`grep -rn "HAL_GetTick().*-\|--.*HAL_GetTick" --include="*.c" .`**
examples:
* stm32h7xx_hal_sd.c:442: if ((HAL_GetTick() - tickstart) \>= SDMMC_DATATIMEOUT)
* stm32h7xx_hal_rcc.c:450: if ((uint32_t)(HAL_GetTick() - tickstart) \> HSE_TIMEOUT_VALUE)
{width=900 height=558}
and sorry for late responding
--
View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/1144#note_146136
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/bugs/attachments/20260318/ff1d6de6/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the bugs
mailing list