Memory Protection (Attributes)
dufault at hda.com
Tue Dec 6 00:58:36 UTC 2011
On Dec 5, 2011, at 7:28 , Chris Johns wrote:
> One thing Gedare and I have discussed when we meet earlier this year is
> a process type solution is not what we see as a suitable model. We see
> issues in offering that type of solution.
What do you mean by "a process type solution"?
If you mean a thread/task corresponds to a unix flavor process then I agree.
I don't see the "use case" (boy, I personally hate that term) of "memory protection available, memory protection completely irrelevant" as a valid "use case" under RTEMS.
(I'd say programming model or something and not use case).
HD Associates, Inc. Software and System Engineering
More information about the devel