gedare at rtems.org
Wed Dec 7 21:45:26 UTC 2011
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Joel Sherrill <joel.sherrill at oarcorp.com> wrote:
> On 12/07/2011 12:39 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>> I was reviewing some of the configure options for specifying stack
>> sizes and came across some odd-seeming behavior.
>> CONFIGURE_MINIMUM_TASK_STACK_SIZE can be defined by an application to
>> increase the size of all of its task stacks (and implicitly the init
>> task and interrupt stacks). It seems wrong/wasteful to propagate the
>> user-defined CONFIGURE_MINIMUM_TASK_STACK_SIZE to both the idle and
>> interrupt stacks, perhaps these should be CPU_STACK_MINIMUM_SIZE
>> unless defined by the user explicitly?
OK now let us address this question.
More information about the devel