Memory Protection (Attributes)

Peter Dufault dufault at
Tue Dec 6 00:58:36 UTC 2011

On Dec 5, 2011, at 7:28 , Chris Johns wrote:

> One thing Gedare and I have discussed when we meet earlier this year is 
> a process type solution is not what we see as a suitable model. We see 
> issues in offering that type of solution.

What do you mean by "a process type solution"?

If you mean a thread/task corresponds to a unix flavor process then I agree.

I don't see the "use case" (boy, I personally hate that term) of "memory protection available, memory protection completely irrelevant" as a valid "use case" under RTEMS.

(I'd say programming model or something and not use case).

Peter Dufault
HD Associates, Inc.      Software and System Engineering

More information about the devel mailing list