[PATCH 1/3] score: Remove _Stack_Adjust_size()
Sebastian Huber
sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
Mon Apr 16 09:00:08 UTC 2012
On 04/15/2012 08:05 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> Where did the original stack size adjustment come from / what was its
> motivation?
The
uint32_t _Stack_Adjust_size(size_t size)
{
return size + CPU_STACK_ALIGNMENT;
}
is there since 1995-05-11 19:39:37. It is probably there since the workspace
allocator only aligns the memory by CPU_HEAP_ALIGNMENT. The stack needs to be
aligned by CPU_STACK_ALIGNMENT. Thus if these values are arbitrary you have to
adjust the allocated memory to fit as a stack. You need to allocate at least
CPU_STACK_ALIGNMENT - 1 additional bytes to do this.
> Will this break something that was "fixed" by the
> previous approach?
I think this fixed a non-existing problem. The CPU_HEAP_ALIGNMENT and
CPU_STACK_ALIGNMENT are roughly the same on all supported architectures. Also
the requested stack size must be considerable larger than CPU_STACK_ALIGNMENT,
otherwise you cannot call any functions. Thus it is not a problem at all to
align the memory.
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Obere Lagerstr. 30, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 18 90 80 79-6
Fax : +49 89 18 90 80 79-9
E-Mail : sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key available on request.
Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
More information about the devel
mailing list