GCC Version Questions

[Ralf Corsepius]

On 04/27/2012 01:35 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 04/27/2012 01:29 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> On 04/27/2012 01:15 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> On 04/27/2012 12:06 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>>> On 04/27/2012 11:57 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>>>> On 04/27/2012 11:47 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>>>>> Or differently:
>>>>>> Do _you_ (Sebastian) want to force the RTEMS-4.11 users to using
>>>>>> arm-eabi and
>>>>>> tell them the target they have been using in their products for years
>>>>>> will now
>>>>>> face a sudden death?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, this is exactly what I want to tell the RTEMS 4.11 users.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> OK, the arm-rtems is gone from rtems-crossrpms.
>>>>
>>>> I'll remove the packages from the repositories, ASAP.
>>>
>>> Ok, thanks for this. Can you please also rename the arm-rtemseabi into
>>> arm-rtems to be in line with all other RTEMS targets.
>>
>> Errr? Upstream GCC _forces_ us to use arm-rtemseabi.
>>
>> We *can* not change this into arm-rtems
>
> Oh, sorry. I will provide a patch for GCC to remove the old arm-rtems
> target and rename arm-rtemseabi into arm-rtems.

This would contradict the working principles of way they are using the 
canonicalization tuple - Anybody with a sane mind would reject such a 
proposal.

Ralf