[PATCH] libcsupport: Add and use rtems_debug_putc()

[Sebastian Huber]

On 13/08/12 18:31, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> Would there be any problem with just using 'rtems_putc'? the
> rtems_debug_putc seems a little weird to me, because I think debug is
> misleading here; I would expect something named as rtems_debug to be only
> available when rtems-enable-debug is on, and otherwise conditionally
> unavailable.

Yes, I think also that the debug is not that good.  Joel was not happy 
with "console".  This "console" is still the best scope name from my 
point of view since the "console" is the default output device.

> Perhaps this is just me though. rtems_bsp_putc might be an ok alternative.

RTEMS + BSP in one name is complete nonsense.

-- 
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH

Address : Obere Lagerstr. 30, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone   : +49 89 18 90 80 79-6
Fax     : +49 89 18 90 80 79-9
E-Mail  : sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
PGP     : Public key available on request.

Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.