New test case compilation

Krzysztof Mięsowicz krzysztof.miesowicz at gmail.com
Tue Aug 21 09:41:30 UTC 2012


It's working finally. Test seems to work right, it eliminated 1 uncovered
branch when tested for pc386 and should eliminate 2 not executed
instructions on erc32.
I have another question: is any convention in test naming? I placed my test
in sptests directory and I am wondering how should I named it. spNUMBER
only or maybe put some information in name?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20120821/a73500d5/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the devel mailing list