New test hitting timespecs

[Krzysztof Mięsowicz]

2012/8/25 Joel Sherrill <joel.sherrill at oarcorp.com>

> FWIW is your 0001 patch for message queue ready to merge? I seem to
> have missed the final version to merge.
>
> Yes, I think it is ready. I sent it to you on 8/22 when you were preparing
to flight home :) But I'm sending it once again as attachment.


> There is precedence in new sptests to use a name of some sort. How about
> sptimespec01?
>

 Ok, I will rename and correct it following your tips and then I'll send
new patch.


> Have I showed you how to run this (by hand) on just a one or a few
> executables and a
> small set of symbols? That  makes the runs faster and it focuses things
> down
> on what you care about.
>

You showed me that I can run single test by run
rtems-testing/sim-scripts/pc386 -c script with coverage enabled option. But
I don't know how to perform analysis on small set of symbols. It could
really speed it a lot.

Krzysztof
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20120827/f47009be/attachment-0001.html>