Gsoc2012: Atomic operation for RTEMS

[Chris Johns]

On 6/06/12 12:33 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>
> No, the "atomic_cpu_generic.h" should provide the type definitions for
> reasonable architectures. It is good to have architecture specific types
> like Atomic_Int, but I think on most architectures it will be "typedef
> Atomic_Int int". For all architectures with straight forward type
> definitions we can use "atomic_cpu_generic.h".
>

This is a good idea.

Chris