[rtems-libbsd commit] Added -g option to Makefile.

Joel Sherrill joel.sherrill at OARcorp.com
Fri Oct 26 12:59:13 UTC 2012

I will not feed the trolls.

On 10/26/2012 04:15 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 10/26/2012 10:30 AM, Chris Johns wrote:
>> Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>> b) the problem with this change is it hard-coding compiler flags - This
>>> is a classical newbie mistake.
>> I see nothing wrong with hard-coding here because it will be thrown away
>> then the code is moved into the main repo. The focus of the project is
>> the TCP stack and not a build system.
> Well, IMO, the build-system is a very important key component of a
> package. What you are doing right now is applying the working
> principle's RTEMS was based on 20-15 years ago, something, many people
> immediately removed once RTEMS went public (In particular Jiri Gaisler
> and me).
>>> c) My opinion about Joel's Makefile fragment system is known.
>>> The most polite formulation of my opinion on it is: Don't use it.
>> Then may I suggest you ignore it.
> That's what I have been doing for most of time. However, I didn't expect
> people to pick them up for major contributions.
>> It is not harming anyone and it is
>> letting them get the project done.
> My opinion differs.
> It has been and is harming the project insofar, as it is
> * a "light bulb attracting the flies" (until the flies notice they will
> get burnt).
> * the origin of having to carry around ballast inside of the source-tree.
> Ralf
> _______________________________________________
> rtems-devel mailing list
> rtems-devel at rtems.org
> http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel

Joel Sherrill, Ph.D.             Director of Research&  Development
joel.sherrill at OARcorp.com        On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS  Huntsville AL 35806
Support Available               (256) 722-9985

More information about the devel mailing list