rfc: VERSION change

[Sebastian Huber]

Hello,

I think this is a good idea.  We may also use some sort of the old Linux 
version scheme, e.g. use .even as the development version and use .odd as a 
release snapshot.

On 04/22/2013 10:51 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose we change the version numbering system for the
> development (and release branches) to represent the next pending
> release number for that branch. So VERSION would contain, for the
> following branches:
> master -> 4.11.0
> 4.10 -> 4.10.3
> 4.9 -> 4.9.7
> 4.8 -> 4.8.3
>
> This will simplify a number of release-related procedures, as well as
> make the master tool versions align with the VERSION information.
> Hopefully it will also reduce user confusion.
>
> Register any complaints or cheers here.
>
> -Gedare
> _______________________________________________
> rtems-devel mailing list
> rtems-devel at rtems.org
> http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
>


-- 
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH

Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone   : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax     : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail  : sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
PGP     : Public key available on request.

Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.