[PATCH] ZYNQ BSP

[Claus, Ric]

Answers:
1) No, not at this stage.
2) No, unfortunately not.  I had hoped to provide a way to deal with this, but there are too many things pressing.
3) I can't say, Gedare.  I'll have to inquire.

Ric

________________________________________
From: gedare at gwmail.gwu.edu [gedare at gwmail.gwu.edu] On Behalf Of Gedare Bloom [gedare at rtems.org]
Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2013 8:44 AM
To: Claus, Ric
Cc: RTEMS Devel
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ZYNQ BSP

I have no real technical questions, but I do have three conceptual questions:
1) Would it make sense that someone might want to use the BSP without
using the Xilinx libraries?

2) Will the BSP compile without the libraries available? If not it
will be harder to verify that RTEMS changes do not break at least the
compilation of the BSP.

3) Should the disclaimer in the zynq.h be moved to a general file in
the root directory like SLAC.txt or something that we can point the
SLAC contributions toward? The SLAC.txt can then include whatever
authorship and sponsor disclaimers are required by your organization,
which can also be used for your past work with the virtex BSPs. Also,
does the "Maintenance of notices" include binary redistributions of
the software, and does the disclaimer of copyright supercede such an
obligation regardless?


-Gedare

[snip]
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtems-devel mailing list
> rtems-devel at rtems.org
> http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel